By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Azemedia new logo
  • Home
  • COP29
  • Opinion
  • News
    • Economy
    • Energy
    • Climate and Ecology
  • Culture
  • Diaspora
  • Interview
  • Science
  • Logistics-Transport
  • Gender
  • History
  • Defense
  • Karabakh
Aze.MediaAze.Media
Font ResizerAa
Search
  • News
  • Economy
  • Climate and Ecology
  • Energy
  • Opinion
  • Culture
  • Gender
  • Interview
  • Science
  • Logistics-Transport
  • History
  • Defense
  • Karabakh
  • Diaspora
  • Who we are
Follow US
© 2021 Aze.Media – Daily Digest
Aze.Media > Opinion > Pashinyan reveals for the first time when he signed trilateral statement on Karabakh and new details
Opinion

Pashinyan reveals for the first time when he signed trilateral statement on Karabakh and new details

The fall of Shusha was a turning point, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said at a meeting of the 44-day war fact-finding commission.

AzeMedia
By AzeMedia Published June 20, 2023 810 Views 6 Min Read
Pashin1

Not only the symbolic importance of Shusha was significant here, but also its strategic importance, he said, explaining why he signed the trilateral statement on November 9.

“After the fall of Shusha, Stepanakert (Khankendi—Ed.) would be under attack, the pressure on Martuni (Khojavand—Ed.) would increase, and most importantly, about 25,000 soldiers could be trapped,” he said.

According to Pashinyan, at the beginning of the negotiations Azerbaijan said that it did not intend to discuss anything pertaining to the status of Karabakh.

“At noon on October 1 I had a phone call with Putin, who confirmed that it was possible to try to stop the war on the basis of the Russian plan worked out years ago. And the conditions were as follows: 7 districts would be returned under the 5+2 formula, the issue of connection between Karabakh and Armenia through the Lachin corridor would be addressed, Russian peacekeepers would be deployed to Karabakh, and Karabakh’s status would remain undefined.

“We agreed with Putin that I would voice our position in the evening. In the afternoon I met with representatives of the extra-parliamentary opposition. Later, the Security Council was convened with the President, the Catholicos, and representatives of the parliamentary forces, where I said that I intended to call and say that I accepted Putin’s proposal. I said that I did not expect anybody present to share responsibility for this decision with me, I was simply informing them about the processes taking place. At the meeting with the extra-parliamentary forces, I said that I had invited them because I felt that by informing them, I was also informing the public, because I cannot tell people everything live on air.

“In the evening I called Putin and told him that I agreed to stop the war on these conditions. The Russian president said he would talk to Aliyev and call me back. At that point 2 districts were already practically under Azerbaijan’s control. Putin called the next day, the morning of October 20, and essentially delivered the following: “Azerbaijan agrees to stop the war if it gets all 7 districts. And there was a new demand: Azerbaijan wants guarantees that the Azerbaijani residents of Shusha, who according to Azerbaijan were 90 percent of the population of the city, would be returned to Shusha.

“For Russia, it was an acceptable solution because they said that the conflict resolution plan that was on the table years ago always included a clause about the return of refugees and displaced people to Karabakh.

“When this clause came up, I asked what Azerbaijan felt these guarantees should be. And it turned out that I had to declare that I agreed to the return of Azerbaijanis to Shusha and the rest of Karabakh. Putin suggested that this issue should remain linked to the status of Karabakh, that is, the return of Karabakh Azerbaijanis would be discussed in the context of a discussion about the status of Karabakh. I agreed, but Azerbaijan rejected this proposal, saying that it would not discuss anything pertaining to the status. Moreover, according to the proposal voiced at that time, not only the Azerbaijanis of Shusha, but also the Azerbaijanis of all the districts, were to have direct and unhindered access to Shusha,” the Armenian PM said.

He said that he had continued the negotiations with the mediation of the Russian president, and there were about 20 phone conversations between them on November 8-9, and about 60 phone conversations overall during the war.

He also said that he had signed the 2020 ceasefire statement on the morning of November 9, although the document itself had not been made public until the evening.

You Might Also Like

Azerbaijan between Türkiye, Iran, and Israel: strategic balance in a changing regional environment

The price of a strategic miscalculation: Tehran is forcing its neighbors to unite against it

What the attack on Nakhchivan airport revealed

Drones over Nakhchivan: an incident or a dangerous signal?

Iranian strike on Azerbaijan… what next?

AzeMedia June 20, 2023 June 20, 2023

New articles

F641cc3e ee8f 4ec0 be97 73cf3910fcb2
Azerbaijan between Türkiye, Iran, and Israel: strategic balance in a changing regional environment
Opinion March 7, 2026
Photo 2026 03 06 21 43
Azerbaijan says it foiled Iranian terror attacks on synagogue, Israeli embassy
News March 7, 2026
Iran war us israel
The price of a strategic miscalculation: Tehran is forcing its neighbors to unite against it
Opinion March 6, 2026
Posolstvo AZ
Azerbaijan recalls its diplomats from Iran
News March 6, 2026
Pua 1024x683
What the attack on Nakhchivan airport revealed
Opinion March 6, 2026
GettyImages 2147784914 scaled
Azerbaijan’s Defense Ministry: Iran sent four drones toward Nakhchivan
Defense March 5, 2026
17727126852740152815 1200x630
Aliyev: Azerbaijan puts armed forces on combat readiness No.1
News March 5, 2026
0d86c1906425a2712f1b5bb059ef8b1d
Azerbaijan’s Defense Ministry: Iranian acts of aggression will not go unanswered
News March 5, 2026
GettyImages 2147784914 scaled
Drones over Nakhchivan: an incident or a dangerous signal?
Opinion March 5, 2026
Photo 2025 06 25 09.47.40
Iranian strike on Azerbaijan… what next?
Opinion March 5, 2026

You Might Also Like

F641cc3e ee8f 4ec0 be97 73cf3910fcb2

Azerbaijan between Türkiye, Iran, and Israel: strategic balance in a changing regional environment

March 7, 2026 13 Min Read
Iran war us israel

The price of a strategic miscalculation: Tehran is forcing its neighbors to unite against it

March 6, 2026 7 Min Read
Pua 1024x683

What the attack on Nakhchivan airport revealed

March 6, 2026 8 Min Read
GettyImages 2147784914 scaled

Drones over Nakhchivan: an incident or a dangerous signal?

March 5, 2026 6 Min Read
Photo 2025 06 25 09.47.40

Iranian strike on Azerbaijan… what next?

March 5, 2026 4 Min Read
416955141 0 0 2000 1130 2072x0 60 0 0 b43c7384a10e7ffb76ad7ba8db50304c

Rasim Musabayov: they are trying to push Iran toward actions against Azerbaijan

March 5, 2026 5 Min Read
Shah deniz gas field offshore azerbaijan source sourthern gas corridor

Azerbaijan in the spotlight: securing Europe’s energy future

March 4, 2026 16 Min Read
D

AZAL airliner tragedy: is the situation finally moving forward?

March 3, 2026 6 Min Read

Useful links

426082d1 a9e4 4ac5 95d4 4e84024eb314 pojkz91103g6zqfh8kiacu662b2tn9znit7ssu9ekg
Ab65ed96 2f4a 4220 91ac f70a6daaf659 pojkz67iflcc0wjkp1aencvsa5gq06ogif9cd0dl34
96e40a2b 5fed 4332 83c6 60e4a89fd4d0 pojkz836t9ewo4gue23nscepgx7gfkvx6okbbkasqo
759bde00 a375 4fa1 bedc f8e9580ceeca pq8mvb9kwubqf6bcadpkq5mz16nayr162k3j2084cg
aze-media-logo-ag1

We are a unique political and socio-cultural digest offering exclusive materials, translations from Azerbaijani media, and reprints of articles from around the world about Azerbaijan.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Cookies Policy

Email: editor@aze.media

© 2021 Aze.Media – Daily Digest
aze-media-logo1 aze-media-logo-ag1
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?