Aze.Media
Who we are
Donate
No Result
View All Result
  • Opinion
  • News
    • Economy
    • Energy
    • Ecology
  • Culture
  • Diaspora
  • Interview
  • Science
  • Logistics-Transport
  • Gender
  • History
  • Defense
  • Karabakh
  • Home page
  • Culture
  • Defense
  • Diaspora
  • Gender
  • History
  • Interview
  • Karabakh
  • Logistics-Transport
  • News
    • Ecology
    • Economy
    • Energy
  • Opinion
  • Science
No Result
View All Result
Aze.Media
Home Opinion

On the Anschluss-Enosis-Miatsum experience and the final resolution of the conflict with Armenians

Just as there are no Azerbaijanis in Armenia, Armenians not living in Azerbaijan in large concentrated communities can be the basis for future peace for both countries.

Author: Zamig Mammadli
November 13, 2021
in Opinion
Reading Time: 4 mins read
254534899_473189977346248_3953452415160653357_n

Although Azerbaijan and Armenia have been living in the de jure “peace” for more than a year, the issue with the Armenians living in Nagorno-Karabakh and the separatist regime there remains unresolved. The de facto “Artsakh Republic” still controls Azerbaijan’s Khankendi, Khojaly, Khojavend, Aghdara, Askeran, as well as almost all the villages around Shusha except one or two.

The fate of the 25-30,000 Armenians living almost in the center of Azerbaijan has been a headache for Azerbaijan and the region for 30 years—to the point where 7 districts of Azerbaijan and up to one million ethnic Azerbaijani population of those districts were sacrificed for the “safety” of several thousand Armenians in Karabakh. Those lands were vacated by force to create a “buffer zone” for 25-30,000 ethnic Armenians in Karabakh.

Although more than 215,000 ethnic Azerbaijanis living in Armenia, officially citizens of the Republic of Armenia, were deported to Azerbaijan between 1987 and 1991, ethnic Armenians remained in the territory of Azerbaijan. Separatist tendencies intensified and, with Armenia’s direct support, gave an impetus to the large-scale, tragic, dreadful First Karabakh War that took the lives of tens of thousands of people.

If there had been a population exchange on ethnic basis in 1988-1991, neither Azerbaijan and Armenia nor the region as a whole would have been dragged into a major conflict that lasted more than 30 years. Given the deep political and ideological roots of the idea of “Miatsum”, i.e., the annexation of Karabakh to Armenia, in the Armenian society, the latest freezing of this conflict on November 10, 2020 only laid the groundwork for future 3rd, 4th, 5th Karabakh wars.

History (including recent past) offers a number of examples of population exchange at the end of wars and conflicts and as a measure to prevent future conflicts. The importance of these practices for long-term peace has already been proven.

If we look at the experience of the last hundred years, after World War I, there was a population exchange under the agreements between Turkey and Greece. Ethnic Greeks were deported to Greece, and ethnic Turks to Turkey, to Thrace and Izmir.

On the eve of World War II, as a continuation of Hitler’s Anschluss policy, Austria and Czechoslovakia’s ethnic German-inhabited Sudetenland were forcibly annexed to Germany. After Germany’s defeat, about 2 million Sudeten Germans, who had been the cause of the war with Czechoslovakia, were relocated from Czechoslovakia to Germany and the Sudetenland was returned to Czechoslovakia. The famous Beneš decrees (a series of decrees on the resettlement of Czechoslovakia’s German population signed by the President of Czechoslovakia Edvard Beneš on March 5, 1946) are still legally valid. This measure, however painful, was aimed at preventing similar conflicts in the future.

Even when the Czech Republic joined the European Union in 2004, the membership documents excluded any claims and rights of Germans deported from the Sudetenland in the Czech Republic and their lawful heirs against the Czech Republic. That is, ethnic German Czechoslovak citizens deported to Germany until 1948 and their heirs were deprived of the right to sue the Czech Republic for compensation in European courts.

The Greek-Turkish conflict in Cyprus in the 1970s was also a bitter consequence of the population exchange on the island not having been carried out in a timely manner.

After World War I, a hybrid parliamentary and governmental system, in which both Greek and Turkish ethnic groups were represented, which had been artificially created with the mediation of Great Britain and later the United Nations, collapsed. Despite the protests of the ethnic Turks of Cyprus, the Greek Cypriots’ idea of uniting the island with Greece led to Turkey’s deployment of troops on the island in 1974, effectively dividing the island in two, with ethnic Turks living in the north and ethnic Greeks living in the south. In the referendum held in Cyprus a few years ago, unlike the Turks, the majority of the Greeks said no to the reunification of the island.

Croatia, now a member of the European Union, was engaged in ethnic and religious wars in the territory of former Yugoslavia in the 1990s and deported ethnic Serbs from its separatist Serb-populated Srpska Krajina region to Serbia, nipping the possibility of another potentially large-scale conflict in the bud.

In other words, in the modern world, the practice of physical separation of ethnic groups that historically do not get along and live in a state of permanent conflict and war, poisoned by nationalist and racist ideologies, is used as the best, pragmatic solution, and this method has no alternative. Population exchange is a preventive solution to avoid future tragedies, wars and massacres.

In our region, a similar but violent population exchange took place between Azerbaijan and Armenia 30 years ago. Yet although more than 215,000 ethnic Azerbaijanis were forcibly expelled from Armenia, ethnic Armenians remained in Karabakh—de jure part of Azerbaijan.

The 0:0 principle should be the only way to resolve this conflict. Giving up mutual enclaves, 25,000 Armenians in Karabakh should be relocated to Armenia, and, as a humanist gesture, they can even be offered compensation. Just as there are no Azerbaijanis in Armenia, Armenians not living in Azerbaijan in large concentrated communities can be the basis for future peace for both countries. A population exchange can prevent future 3rd, 4th and 5th Karabakh wars. It can also end the 100-year-old Armenian-Turkish ethnic war that began in 1905. History shows that conflicts will not die down as long as we live side by side. The only way to end this is a population exchange.

In my opinion, the Azerbaijani side should think about ways to relocate the ethnic Armenians living in Nagorno-Karabakh to Armenia, using the European and world experience. If Armenia has the political will and commitment toward a long-term peace with Azerbaijan, it will be possible to arrange the population exchange painlessly and quickly.

Aze.Media

Share8Tweet5SendShare

Get real time update about this post categories directly on your device, subscribe now.

Unsubscribe

Related Posts

The-leaders-of-Armenia-and-Azerbaijan-meet-with-EU-President-Charles-Michel-in-Brussels-on-May-22.-president.az_
Opinion

EU mediates conflict in South Caucasus, long part of Russia’s geopolitical orbit

June 24, 2022
56-3
Opinion

Baku’s “East Caspian” strategy: The unseen side of Ilham Aliyev’s visit to Uzbekistan

June 22, 2022
Bildschirmfoto 2022-06-21 um 08.49.18
Opinion

Full throttle: Australia’s advantages alongside Azerbaijan

June 21, 2022
Armenian Opposition Rally
Opinion

The Fall of the Tent Empire – Where has the Armenian “revolution” gone?

June 20, 2022
21_162_image1
Opinion

Israel, Armenia and Presbyterians

June 18, 2022
77210d7f-507c-3931-9d21-d973689de7c3
Opinion

Sneaky and bellicose Armenians – In the wake of an attack in Paris

June 17, 2022
fe93b66b-64f0-307c-858e-1fe58273e720_850
Opinion

Baku between Davos and Munich: Our contribution to global security

June 17, 2022
0bebc3c92cf85310d8ceefec2038efda
Energy

Investment triumph on the banks of the Thames: Baku and London stake on “green” energy

June 17, 2022

New articles

Energy

DEWA, Azerbaijan discuss bilateral relations in energy sector, business opportunities

June 25, 2022
Opinion

EU mediates conflict in South Caucasus, long part of Russia’s geopolitical orbit

June 24, 2022
Covid-19

EU-funded Solidarity for Health Initiative presents its results

June 24, 2022
Economy

Black Sea Trade and Development Bank announces net profit of 43.9 million Euro for 2021

June 24, 2022
Gender

Women in diplomacy: a centuries-old practice in Azerbaijan

June 24, 2022
News

Russian FM: OSCE Minsk Group ceased operations

June 24, 2022
Energy

BP paid the Azeri government $10.59bn in production entitlements and other fees last year.

June 24, 2022
News

Peace agreement proposal left unanswered by Armenia: Aliyev

June 24, 2022
News

Lavrov offers Azerbaijan to relaunch bilateral cooperation formats suspended during coronavirus pandemic

June 24, 2022
Science

Lotfi Zadeh – a man that changed the world: Azerbaijani roots of revolutionary “fuzzy logic”

June 24, 2022
c24a7d34-02d2-45a2-95ad-980aa8264ad5
426082d1-a9e4-4ac5-95d4-4e84024eb314
ab65ed96-2f4a-4220-91ac-f70a6daaf659
96e40a2b-5fed-4332-83c6-60e4a89fd4d0
759bde00-a375-4fa1-bedc-f8e9580ceeca
aze-media-logo-ag

Aze.Media offers an independent and strategic insight on socio-cultural, political and economic life in Azerbaijan. We are thinkers of diverse disciplines spread across countries working together as one team to provide international audiences with an alternative point of view on Azerbaijani and foreign realities.

Email: editor@aze.media


© 2021 Aze Media International Platform for Alternative Thought.

No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Economy
  • Ecology
  • Energy
  • Opinion
  • Culture
  • Gender
  • Interview
  • Science
  • Logistics-Transport
  • History
  • Defense
  • Karabakh
  • Diaspora
  • Who we are

© 2021 Aze Media International Platform for Alternative Thought.