Aze.Media
Who we are
Donate
No Result
View All Result
  • Opinion
  • News
    • Economy
    • Energy
    • Ecology
  • Culture
  • Diaspora
  • Interview
  • Science
  • Logistics-Transport
  • Gender
  • History
  • Defense
  • Karabakh
  • Home page
  • Culture
  • Defense
  • Diaspora
  • Gender
  • History
  • Interview
  • Karabakh
  • Logistics-Transport
  • News
    • Ecology
    • Economy
    • Energy
  • Opinion
  • Science
No Result
View All Result
Aze.Media
Home Opinion

Yerevan’s radical turn in its Nagorno-Karabakh policy

On 13 April, Armenia’s prime minister Nikol Pashinyan said during his speech at the National Assembly (parliament) that his government was planning to sign a peace agreement with Azerbaijan soon, as “the peace agenda has no alternative for us”.

Author: AzeMedia
April 15, 2022
in Opinion
Reading Time: 4 mins read
xArmenian,P20National,P20Assembly.jpeg,qitok=LXg_82oz.pagespeed.ic.1Xmtx14sSG

The Armenian parliament, the National Assembly, Yerevan; Office of the Prime Minister of Armenia

He also stated that the main goal of the negotiations for Yerevan would no longer be agreeing on the future status of Nagorno-Karabakh (within Azerbaijan), but to ensure all rights and security guarantees for Karabakh Armenians: the territory’s status would remain a means to an end. As regards the Karabakh peace process, he stressed the need for direct, bilateral talks with Baku (with the support of intermediaries), as well as for a revival in regional policy, including contacts with Ankara. He mentioned Russia as being an very important actor in this process, although he did not particularly emphasise its role. At the same time, his speech included a veiled criticism of the Russian peacekeeping forces and, more openly, of the Collective Security Treaty Organisation, which he accused of inaction. The public reaction in Armenia to this speech has for the time being remained moderate, but it caused outrage in the unrecognised Nagorno-Karabakh Republic (NKR), and led to accusations that he was intending to cross the ‘red lines’. In a statement adopted on 14 April, the NKR’s parliament called on Pashinyan to withdraw from the political line he had just announced

Commentary

  • The theses of the prime minister’s speech indicate a radical shift in Yerevan’s policy and a complete change in its negotiation philosophy. Pashinyan has expressis verbis recognised the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan and stated that the ‘Karabakh issue’ refers not to the territory itself (wherein the status of Nagorno-Karabakh was of key importance), but to guaranteeing the rights of the ethnic Armenian people who live there. This undermines the policy Armenia has pursued over the last three decades, including by Pashinyan himself before the outbreak of the Second Karabakh War (which the prime minister criticised deeply and on many levels). It seems that the new approach results from a more realistic assessment of the situation in the region and beyond (Armenia undeniably lost the war in 2020; Russia’s involvement in Ukraine and the fact it doesn`t offer Armenia any real security guarantees; global opinion favours Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity), as well as in Armenia itself (the prime minister enjoys a strong domestic political position since his victory in last year’s parliamentary elections).
  • PM Pashinyan has effectively called into questioned the existing regional security architecture, in which Russia plays a dominant role. Moscow guaranteed Armenia’s security – unsuccessfully, as the 2020 war showed – and acted as the main mediator in the Karabakh peace process. Pashinyan did emphasise the role played by his contact with President Vladimir Putin and the tripartite working group (Armenia, Azerbaijan and Russia) at deputy prime minister level, which dealt with the opening of communication routes (although its activity of more than a year has not had any visible effects); however, he devoted more attention to the efforts made by the EU and the president of the European Council Charles Michel, who arranged two meetings between Pashinyan and the president of Azerbaijan, Ilham Aliyev. Pashinyan confirmed that that Yerevan would meet the deadline set at the last meeting (6 April) to set up a bilateral commission for border delimitation and border security (by the end of the month). The prime minister also indirectly criticised the Russian peacekeeping forces, stating that the incident on March 24 (when Azerbaijani forces entered an Armenian village in Nagorno-Karabakh) took place within the sphere of their responsibility (see more in Tension escalates in Nagorno-Karabakh). He was more open in this criticism of the Collective Security Treaty Organisation, which did not even decide to send a monitoring mission during the local escalation of the conflict in May 2021. It seems that Pashinyan will try to build up a broader, more informal international coalition around the Karabakh issue, in which Western states and structures, including the US, France and the EU, will be the dominant players. In this situation, Yerevan emphasising goodwill and a desire to make concessions would encourage these actors to put pressure on Baku to formally guarantee the full rights of Karabakh’s Armenians.
  • It is possible that Moscow, which does not want to lose its privileged position in the peace process or its influence in Armenia, will try to call Yerevan to heel. This is indicated by the Russian MFA’s ad hoc appointment of a special representative for the normalisation of relations between Armenia and Azerbaijan. On 14 April it was announced that Igor Khovaev, who was also Russia’s representative in the OSCE Minsk Group – the structure formally responsible for the Karabakh peace process, co-chaired by Russia, France and the US – had been nominated to this position.
  • It is difficult to predict how Pashinyan’s speech will be further met by the general public and the opposition in Armenia. On the one hand, the people are aware of the scale of Armenia’s defeat in the Karabakh war and the failure of the current policy (as well as ‘fatigue’ at the issue that has dominated Armenian public life in recent decades, making the country’s normal economic development impossible in practice); on the other hand, however, they may conclude that the prime minister has ‘betrayed’ the nation’s interests, which in an extreme case may provoke attempts to assassinate him. It should be expected that the Armenian opposition, including the former presidents Robert Kocharyan and Serzh Sargsyan, will try to motivate Armenians both inside and outside the country to protest against the new Karabakh policy and activate Pashinyan’s opponents in the power structures. The prime minister tried to minimise the above-mentioned threats by delivering the speech in the run-up to Easter, when interest in politics naturally falls off. In addition, he replaced the commanding staff in the army (officers of the General Staff demanded his resignation in February 2021). Moreover, a month ago Vahagn Khachaturiayn became the new president of Armenia; he was put forward for the post by Pashinyan’s party (unconfirmed but likely reports say his predecessor resigned because he did not want to sign the expected future peace agreements with Azerbaijan and Turkey). The parliament of the unrecognised Nagorno-Karabakh Republic has reacted sharply to the new policy initiative. At an extraordinary meeting on 14 April, it adopted a resolution condemning what it saw as plans for “the forcible incorporation of Artsakh [Nagorno-Karabakh] into Azerbaijan in the name of peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan”, and called upon the Armenian government to withdraw from its “pernicious posture”.

Wojciech Górecki

Bildschirmfoto 2022-04-15 um 16.14.11

Share6Tweet4SendShare

Get real time update about this post categories directly on your device, subscribe now.

Unsubscribe

Related Posts

d31eed6d18b07642f46f6718e0c69b0a
Opinion

“Caspian Interest”: Purpose of Russian FM’s visit to Azerbaijan

June 26, 2022
The-leaders-of-Armenia-and-Azerbaijan-meet-with-EU-President-Charles-Michel-in-Brussels-on-May-22.-president.az_
Opinion

EU mediates conflict in South Caucasus, long part of Russia’s geopolitical orbit

June 24, 2022
56-3
Opinion

Baku’s “East Caspian” strategy: The unseen side of Ilham Aliyev’s visit to Uzbekistan

June 22, 2022
Bildschirmfoto 2022-06-21 um 08.49.18
Opinion

Full throttle: Australia’s advantages alongside Azerbaijan

June 21, 2022
Armenian Opposition Rally
Opinion

The Fall of the Tent Empire – Where has the Armenian “revolution” gone?

June 20, 2022
21_162_image1
Opinion

Israel, Armenia and Presbyterians

June 18, 2022
77210d7f-507c-3931-9d21-d973689de7c3
Opinion

Sneaky and bellicose Armenians – In the wake of an attack in Paris

June 17, 2022
fe93b66b-64f0-307c-858e-1fe58273e720_850
Opinion

Baku between Davos and Munich: Our contribution to global security

June 17, 2022

New articles

Karabakh

President: Azerbaijanis to live in liberated lands forever – Azerbaijani president’s full speech

June 27, 2022
Opinion

“Caspian Interest”: Purpose of Russian FM’s visit to Azerbaijan

June 26, 2022
News

Azerbaijani president visits Goygol, Kalbajar, Lachin districts

June 26, 2022
Defense

Azerbaijan marks Armed Forces Day

June 26, 2022
Energy

DEWA, Azerbaijan discuss bilateral relations in energy sector, business opportunities

June 25, 2022
Opinion

EU mediates conflict in South Caucasus, long part of Russia’s geopolitical orbit

June 24, 2022
Covid-19

EU-funded Solidarity for Health Initiative presents its results

June 24, 2022
Economy

Black Sea Trade and Development Bank announces net profit of 43.9 million Euro for 2021

June 24, 2022
Gender

Women in diplomacy: a centuries-old practice in Azerbaijan

June 24, 2022
News

Russian FM: OSCE Minsk Group ceased operations

June 24, 2022
c24a7d34-02d2-45a2-95ad-980aa8264ad5
426082d1-a9e4-4ac5-95d4-4e84024eb314
ab65ed96-2f4a-4220-91ac-f70a6daaf659
96e40a2b-5fed-4332-83c6-60e4a89fd4d0
759bde00-a375-4fa1-bedc-f8e9580ceeca
aze-media-logo-ag

Aze.Media offers an independent and strategic insight on socio-cultural, political and economic life in Azerbaijan. We are thinkers of diverse disciplines spread across countries working together as one team to provide international audiences with an alternative point of view on Azerbaijani and foreign realities.

Email: editor@aze.media


© 2021 Aze Media International Platform for Alternative Thought.

No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Economy
  • Ecology
  • Energy
  • Opinion
  • Culture
  • Gender
  • Interview
  • Science
  • Logistics-Transport
  • History
  • Defense
  • Karabakh
  • Diaspora
  • Who we are

© 2021 Aze Media International Platform for Alternative Thought.