By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Azemedia new logo
  • Home
  • COP29
  • Opinion
  • News
    • Economy
    • Energy
    • Climate and Ecology
  • Culture
  • Diaspora
  • Interview
  • Science
  • Logistics-Transport
  • Gender
  • History
  • Defense
  • Karabakh
Aze.MediaAze.Media
Font ResizerAa
Search
  • News
  • Economy
  • Climate and Ecology
  • Energy
  • Opinion
  • Culture
  • Gender
  • Interview
  • Science
  • Logistics-Transport
  • History
  • Defense
  • Karabakh
  • Diaspora
  • Who we are
Follow US
© 2021 Aze.Media – Daily Digest
Aze.Media > Opinion > Russian peacekeepers: Constructive ambiguity
Opinion

Russian peacekeepers: Constructive ambiguity

AzeMedia
By AzeMedia Published June 16, 2022 9 Min Read
2020 11 13t120039z 1765745756 rc2c2k93j0ee rtrmadp 3 armenia azerbaijan
An Azerbaijani service member and a Russian peacekeeper stand guard at a checkpoint on the outskirts of Shusha (Shushi) in the region of Nagorno-Karabakh on November 13, 2020 [Reuters]

The ceasefire agreement stipulates the bare minimum without going into extensive details on the nature and functional scope of the peacekeepers. The overwhelming feeling is that the lack of a clearly stipulated mandate is due to the fact that the parties did not come to a common understanding and the suggested specification modes have militated against the interests of at least one of the actors.

Baku does not want to concur with any agreement that may remotely or potentially endanger its sovereignty over Karabakh. Moscow seems to be relatively satisfied with the present sway it has over the facts on the ground and has no appetite for facilitating a new arrangement that would have enabled Azerbaijan to exercise de facto control over its sovereign territories, currently within the zone of responsibility of the Russian contingent.

However, the concern in Armenia seems to be that any new arrangement leading to gradual retrenchment of the Russian presence in Karabakh will be a blow to its contrived hopes for the resuscitation of the remnants of the so-called illegal and unrecognised “Nagorno-Karabakh Republic (NKR)”.

Known precepts

It is abundantly clear that the normative framework applicable to the peacekeepers is relatively unspecified. Article 3 defines their deployment zone as “along the contact line in the (former) Nagorno-Karabakh and along the Lachin corridor”. The self-same article prescribes the extent of the contingent within the limits of the “1960 military personnel with small arms, 90 armoured personnel carriers and 380 units of automotive and special equipment”.

Article 4 states that the peacekeeping contingent “shall be deployed in parallel with the withdrawal of the Armenian armed forces”, and the duration of its period of stay is defined on the basis of a “5+5” formula, in line with which the timeframe is five years that “shall be automatically extended by a further five-year period if none of the Parties declares six months prior to the expiration of the period of its intention to terminate the application of the provision”.

Despite this, when it comes to the exact content of the mandate or to the clearly-delineated functions and duties of the peacekeepers, these are not addressed in any provision of the trilateral declaration. Article 5 states that “in order to increase the effectiveness of control over the implementation of the agreement by the parties to the conflict, a peacekeeping centre shall be deployed to exercise control over the ceasefire”.

This is different from the peacekeeping contingent and refers to the joint Russian-Turkish monitoring group based in Aghdam, established in accordance with the 11 November memorandum of understanding between Moscow and Ankara. This entity has not, to date, been proven to sway considerable influence over the state of operational affairs on the ground. Its importance lies in the fact it provides space for Turkish presence in Karabakh, with potential consequences to follow.

Future prospects

The 19 months following the trilateral declaration and deployment of the Russian peacekeepers have not been completely devoid of problems. Although Baku, on the whole, praised Moscow’s role in a trilateral format, on a more specific level, its attitude towards peacekeepers has been critical in a measured tone. It is generally assumed that the rapid turnover of mission heads was instigated by virtue of Azerbaijan’s disapproval.

Since the peacekeepers are stationed in the internationally-recognised territories of Azerbaijan, the latter’s red lines and their implications for the mandate dilemma are to be duly evaluated.

First of all, Baku does not want to alter the present “temporality” of the peacekeeping contingent. The terminological attitude adopted favours the expression “the temporary zone of the Russian peacekeepers”, which is quite apt, as it reflects the “5+5” formula and the veto right as to termination. Incidentally, the word “temporary” is not always present in the language employed by Russian officials, a semantic issue with seismic implications.

Secondly, Baku does not seem to be inclined to give the peacekeepers a more formal status or treaty-based legitimacy. The 10 November declaration is a ceasefire agreement and not a peace treaty. Article 4 of the trilateral declaration has not been fully implemented, as the remnants of the so-called “NKR” are still present in Khankandi. The fear is that a more entrenched Russian presence in Karabakh, without Baku’s direct involvement, will involve corollary risks.

Thirdly, Baku may sign such a document specifying the exact mandate only on a bilateral basis with Russia. Although the trilateral declaration – the current basis of the Russian peacekeeping mission – is signed by Azerbaijan, Armenia and Russia, it is apparent that because the Russian peacekeeping mission zone is sovereign Azerbaijani territory, Baku does not believe Yerevan should be a direct party to a legal instrument, specifying the peacekeepers’ mandate.

The likely probability is that the constructive ambiguity that is presently the case will remain unaltered in the immediate future. A clear legal mandate is possible if Baku obtains a measurable amount of effective control in what is now the temporary area of the Russian contingent.

One could assume, albeit tentatively, that the fate of the peacekeepers will be decided upon closer to 2025 – towards the deadline when Azerbaijan may exercise its veto right. At present, chastened in Ukraine and under international pressure, it is unlikely that Russia will aspire to gain more leverage than is currently the case. Given the peacekeepers’ track record, which has not exactly been perfect, Azerbaijan’s present and considered calculation does not seem to favour agreeing to a clear mandate.

Orkhan Amashov

Caliber.Az

You Might Also Like

Pakistan and Azerbaijan deepen economic ties

The Kremlin’s scenario exposed: why Russia is reinforcing its military base in Gyumri

How Karabakh is becoming a symbol of Azerbaijani success

After the crisis – a cold spell: What lies ahead for Azerbaijan–Russia relations

Khankendi becomes a turning point: The summit changed the rules of the game

AzeMedia June 16, 2022 June 16, 2022

New articles

Azerbaijan pakistan relations 1200x781
Pakistan and Azerbaijan deepen economic ties
Economy Opinion July 8, 2025
1735830384
Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan, and Kazakhstan establish joint venture to launch the “Caspian Green Energy Corridor”
Energy News July 8, 2025
Israel Azerbaijan Flag 220323
Prominent US rabbi calls to include Azerbaijan in the Abraham Accords: “This is a phenomenal moment”
News July 8, 2025
H 5787782 1280
Hikmet Hajiyev: The ball is now in the EU’s court
Interview July 8, 2025
102 base
The Kremlin’s scenario exposed: why Russia is reinforcing its military base in Gyumri
Opinion July 7, 2025
1751655102 986642bab4094ba3150a3058f13e4639
How Karabakh is becoming a symbol of Azerbaijani success
Opinion July 7, 2025
1751648992122731816 1200x630
Pezeshkian faced intimidation ahead of visit to Azerbaijan
News July 5, 2025
97033886 tass 16540599
After the crisis – a cold spell: What lies ahead for Azerbaijan–Russia relations
Opinion July 5, 2025
17516265673079065174 1200x630
Khankendi becomes a turning point: The summit changed the rules of the game
Opinion July 5, 2025
D70c2eac ca02 32c8 aaca 8251b01fa4b7 850
Azerbaijan hosts historic ECO Summit in Khankendi: President Aliyev highlights regional cooperation, post-war reconstruction, and energy leadership
News July 4, 2025

You Might Also Like

Azerbaijan pakistan relations 1200x781

Pakistan and Azerbaijan deepen economic ties

July 8, 2025 9 Min Read
102 base

The Kremlin’s scenario exposed: why Russia is reinforcing its military base in Gyumri

July 7, 2025 10 Min Read
1751655102 986642bab4094ba3150a3058f13e4639

How Karabakh is becoming a symbol of Azerbaijani success

July 7, 2025 4 Min Read
97033886 tass 16540599

After the crisis – a cold spell: What lies ahead for Azerbaijan–Russia relations

July 5, 2025 6 Min Read
17516265673079065174 1200x630

Khankendi becomes a turning point: The summit changed the rules of the game

July 5, 2025 7 Min Read
Southern caucasus en.1000x0

The South Caucasus is set for geopolitical realignment

July 3, 2025 10 Min Read
Lachin seyrangah 15

Azerbaijan demonstrates strength. Khankendi hosts ECO Summit

July 3, 2025 10 Min Read
Beautiful,national,state,flags,of,iran,and,russia,together,at

Azerbaijan’s pushback against Russia and Iran is Redefining its Regional Role

July 3, 2025 13 Min Read

Useful links

426082d1 a9e4 4ac5 95d4 4e84024eb314 pojkz91103g6zqfh8kiacu662b2tn9znit7ssu9ekg
Ab65ed96 2f4a 4220 91ac f70a6daaf659 pojkz67iflcc0wjkp1aencvsa5gq06ogif9cd0dl34
96e40a2b 5fed 4332 83c6 60e4a89fd4d0 pojkz836t9ewo4gue23nscepgx7gfkvx6okbbkasqo
759bde00 a375 4fa1 bedc f8e9580ceeca pq8mvb9kwubqf6bcadpkq5mz16nayr162k3j2084cg
aze-media-logo-ag1

We are a unique political and socio-cultural digest offering exclusive materials, translations from Azerbaijani media, and reprints of articles from around the world about Azerbaijan.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Cookies Policy

Email: editor@aze.media

© 2021 Aze.Media – Daily Digest
aze-media-logo1 aze-media-logo-ag1
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?