Aze.Media
Who we are
Donate
No Result
View All Result
  • Opinion
  • News
    • Economy
    • Energy
    • Ecology
  • Culture
  • Diaspora
  • Interview
  • Science
  • Logistics-Transport
  • Gender
  • History
  • Defense
  • Karabakh
  • Home page
  • Culture
  • Defense
  • Diaspora
  • Gender
  • History
  • Interview
  • Karabakh
  • Logistics-Transport
  • News
    • Ecology
    • Economy
    • Energy
  • Opinion
  • Science
No Result
View All Result
Aze.Media
Home Opinion

Russian peacekeepers: Constructive ambiguity

The legal foundation of the temporary presence of the Russian peacekeeping contingent in Karabakh is presently hinging on the 10 November 2020 trilateral declaration, yet its mandate remains shrouded in what one may call "constructive ambiguity".

Author: AzeMedia
June 16, 2022
in Opinion
Reading Time: 4 mins read
2020-11-13T120039Z_1765745756_RC2C2K93J0EE_RTRMADP_3_ARMENIA-AZERBAIJAN

An Azerbaijani service member and a Russian peacekeeper stand guard at a checkpoint on the outskirts of Shusha (Shushi) in the region of Nagorno-Karabakh on November 13, 2020 [Reuters]

The ceasefire agreement stipulates the bare minimum without going into extensive details on the nature and functional scope of the peacekeepers. The overwhelming feeling is that the lack of a clearly stipulated mandate is due to the fact that the parties did not come to a common understanding and the suggested specification modes have militated against the interests of at least one of the actors.

Baku does not want to concur with any agreement that may remotely or potentially endanger its sovereignty over Karabakh. Moscow seems to be relatively satisfied with the present sway it has over the facts on the ground and has no appetite for facilitating a new arrangement that would have enabled Azerbaijan to exercise de facto control over its sovereign territories, currently within the zone of responsibility of the Russian contingent.

However, the concern in Armenia seems to be that any new arrangement leading to gradual retrenchment of the Russian presence in Karabakh will be a blow to its contrived hopes for the resuscitation of the remnants of the so-called illegal and unrecognised “Nagorno-Karabakh Republic (NKR)”.

LatestNews

224924

A delay in the delimitation of the Azerbaijan–Armenia border

August 17, 2022
Meet-George-Deek_htm_8a9d7ab53d33b742

‘Take Iranian terrorism seriously’ says Israel envoy to Azerbaijan after Rushdie stabbing, personal death threat

August 17, 2022

Iran: Azerbaijan’s good neighbour or sneaky adversary? Inconsistency of Tehran diplomacy

August 16, 2022

Will the EU make moves in Armenia-Azerbaijan normalization?

August 16, 2022

Known precepts

It is abundantly clear that the normative framework applicable to the peacekeepers is relatively unspecified. Article 3 defines their deployment zone as “along the contact line in the (former) Nagorno-Karabakh and along the Lachin corridor”. The self-same article prescribes the extent of the contingent within the limits of the “1960 military personnel with small arms, 90 armoured personnel carriers and 380 units of automotive and special equipment”.

Article 4 states that the peacekeeping contingent “shall be deployed in parallel with the withdrawal of the Armenian armed forces”, and the duration of its period of stay is defined on the basis of a “5+5” formula, in line with which the timeframe is five years that “shall be automatically extended by a further five-year period if none of the Parties declares six months prior to the expiration of the period of its intention to terminate the application of the provision”.

Despite this, when it comes to the exact content of the mandate or to the clearly-delineated functions and duties of the peacekeepers, these are not addressed in any provision of the trilateral declaration. Article 5 states that “in order to increase the effectiveness of control over the implementation of the agreement by the parties to the conflict, a peacekeeping centre shall be deployed to exercise control over the ceasefire”.

This is different from the peacekeeping contingent and refers to the joint Russian-Turkish monitoring group based in Aghdam, established in accordance with the 11 November memorandum of understanding between Moscow and Ankara. This entity has not, to date, been proven to sway considerable influence over the state of operational affairs on the ground. Its importance lies in the fact it provides space for Turkish presence in Karabakh, with potential consequences to follow.

Future prospects

The 19 months following the trilateral declaration and deployment of the Russian peacekeepers have not been completely devoid of problems. Although Baku, on the whole, praised Moscow’s role in a trilateral format, on a more specific level, its attitude towards peacekeepers has been critical in a measured tone. It is generally assumed that the rapid turnover of mission heads was instigated by virtue of Azerbaijan’s disapproval.

Since the peacekeepers are stationed in the internationally-recognised territories of Azerbaijan, the latter’s red lines and their implications for the mandate dilemma are to be duly evaluated.

First of all, Baku does not want to alter the present “temporality” of the peacekeeping contingent. The terminological attitude adopted favours the expression “the temporary zone of the Russian peacekeepers”, which is quite apt, as it reflects the “5+5” formula and the veto right as to termination. Incidentally, the word “temporary” is not always present in the language employed by Russian officials, a semantic issue with seismic implications.

Secondly, Baku does not seem to be inclined to give the peacekeepers a more formal status or treaty-based legitimacy. The 10 November declaration is a ceasefire agreement and not a peace treaty. Article 4 of the trilateral declaration has not been fully implemented, as the remnants of the so-called “NKR” are still present in Khankandi. The fear is that a more entrenched Russian presence in Karabakh, without Baku’s direct involvement, will involve corollary risks.

Thirdly, Baku may sign such a document specifying the exact mandate only on a bilateral basis with Russia. Although the trilateral declaration – the current basis of the Russian peacekeeping mission – is signed by Azerbaijan, Armenia and Russia, it is apparent that because the Russian peacekeeping mission zone is sovereign Azerbaijani territory, Baku does not believe Yerevan should be a direct party to a legal instrument, specifying the peacekeepers’ mandate.

The likely probability is that the constructive ambiguity that is presently the case will remain unaltered in the immediate future. A clear legal mandate is possible if Baku obtains a measurable amount of effective control in what is now the temporary area of the Russian contingent.

One could assume, albeit tentatively, that the fate of the peacekeepers will be decided upon closer to 2025 – towards the deadline when Azerbaijan may exercise its veto right. At present, chastened in Ukraine and under international pressure, it is unlikely that Russia will aspire to gain more leverage than is currently the case. Given the peacekeepers’ track record, which has not exactly been perfect, Azerbaijan’s present and considered calculation does not seem to favour agreeing to a clear mandate.

Orkhan Amashov

Caliber.Az

Share6Tweet4SendShare

Get real time update about this post categories directly on your device, subscribe now.

Unsubscribe

Related Posts

224924
Opinion

A delay in the delimitation of the Azerbaijan–Armenia border

August 17, 2022
Meet-George-Deek_htm_8a9d7ab53d33b742
Opinion

‘Take Iranian terrorism seriously’ says Israel envoy to Azerbaijan after Rushdie stabbing, personal death threat

August 17, 2022
3be965f7849a54fcb33124a0766035db
Opinion

Iran: Azerbaijan’s good neighbour or sneaky adversary? Inconsistency of Tehran diplomacy

August 16, 2022
The-leaders-of-Armenia-and-Azerbaijan-meet-with-EU-President-Charles-Michel-in-Brussels-on-May-22.-president.az_
Opinion

Will the EU make moves in Armenia-Azerbaijan normalization?

August 16, 2022
Oil rigs against the backdrop of the colorful sky and a flagpole with the flag of Kazakhstan. The concept of oil production, minerals, development of
Energy

Can Europe receive Kazakh oil through the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline?

August 16, 2022
224464
Opinion

‘Decisive steps by Armenia critical for cooperation in South Caucasus’

August 14, 2022
azerbaycan-iran
Opinion

Iran continues to scheme against Azerbaijan

August 14, 2022
04-1_9810eab3
Opinion

Pro-Kremlin analyst: Little by little all lands in Karabakh will come under Azerbaijan’s control

August 13, 2022

New articles

Opinion

A delay in the delimitation of the Azerbaijan–Armenia border

August 17, 2022
Economy

Top 10 countries importing Azerbaijani oil

August 17, 2022
Economy

Car imports in Azerbaijan decreased by 13%

August 17, 2022
Economy

SmilePay rolls out face payments in Azerbaijan

August 17, 2022
Opinion

‘Take Iranian terrorism seriously’ says Israel envoy to Azerbaijan after Rushdie stabbing, personal death threat

August 17, 2022
Energy

Two-week output suspension for BP’s Shah Deniz platform

August 16, 2022
Diaspora

Azerbaijani community in the UK: The Mahdi Servants Union should be recognized as a terrorist organization

August 16, 2022
Opinion

Iran: Azerbaijan’s good neighbour or sneaky adversary? Inconsistency of Tehran diplomacy

August 16, 2022
News

Israel’s ambassador to Baku: They want to kill me

August 16, 2022
Opinion

Will the EU make moves in Armenia-Azerbaijan normalization?

August 16, 2022
c24a7d34-02d2-45a2-95ad-980aa8264ad5
426082d1-a9e4-4ac5-95d4-4e84024eb314
ab65ed96-2f4a-4220-91ac-f70a6daaf659
96e40a2b-5fed-4332-83c6-60e4a89fd4d0
759bde00-a375-4fa1-bedc-f8e9580ceeca
aze-media-logo-ag

Aze.Media offers an independent and strategic insight on socio-cultural, political and economic life in Azerbaijan. We are thinkers of diverse disciplines spread across countries working together as one team to provide international audiences with an alternative point of view on Azerbaijani and foreign realities.

Email: editor@aze.media


© 2021 Aze Media International Platform for Alternative Thought.

No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Economy
  • Ecology
  • Energy
  • Opinion
  • Culture
  • Gender
  • Interview
  • Science
  • Logistics-Transport
  • History
  • Defense
  • Karabakh
  • Diaspora
  • Who we are

© 2021 Aze Media International Platform for Alternative Thought.