Aze.Media
Who we are
Donate
No Result
View All Result
  • Opinion
  • News
    • Economy
    • Energy
    • Ecology
  • Culture
  • Diaspora
  • Interview
  • Science
  • Logistics-Transport
  • Gender
  • History
  • Defense
  • Karabakh
  • Home page
  • Culture
  • Defense
  • Diaspora
  • Gender
  • History
  • Interview
  • Karabakh
  • Logistics-Transport
  • News
    • Ecology
    • Economy
    • Energy
  • Opinion
  • Science
No Result
View All Result
Aze.Media
Home Karabakh

The Karabakh conflict is not Hussein’s Iraq

Above image recently submitted to the record is of an Azerbaijani grave that was disinterred during the Armenian occupation of Karabakh. The Karabakh conflict was not a hostile foreign invasion by Azerbaijan of Armenian territory, but was rather the ethnic cleansing by the Armenian government of a region that is internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan but was once mutually occupied by Azerbaijanis and Armenians. Read more survivor testimony below to understand a further perspective of the conflict.

Author: Rachel Brooks
April 18, 2021
in Karabakh
Reading Time: 5 mins read
5fc69ea5b729b.hires

Azerbaijani soldiers celebrate the transfer of the Lachin region to Azerbaijan's control, in Aghjabadi, Azerbaijan, on Dec. 1, 2020. EMRAH GUREL/AP

The Karabakh conflict is not, nor has it been, Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, even though The National Interest on April 16 argued that it was. The article, written by Michael Rubin, made comparisons between the Azerbaijani president Ilham Aliyev and Saddam Hussein. The basis of the criticism was the direct comparison between the explosively controversial Park of Trophies museum that displaced helmets and wax figures of fallen Armenian soldiers from the conflict and the war museums of the Iran-Iraq conflict. 

Context of the era of the Khomeinist revolution in Tabriz, Iran followed by the war in Iraq as told by a survivor sheds a light on why the Karabakh conflict is not to be seen in the same light.

Yet, the analysis in the National Interest piece made some inferences in its analysis that were based on media campaign rhetoric and not fact. Critics of Rubin’s piece most swiftly pointed out the discrepancy between Aliyev’s defense of his own country and Hussein’s invasion of a foreign country, Kuwait. The comparison of Aliyev and Hussein in regards to their conflicts would need to take the position that Aliyev was invading and seizing Karabakh, when in fact Karabakh was land occupied illegally by the Armenian government initially. 

LatestNews

9235EEE6-08AA-495B-9617-673293E25CFA

The European mass graves you never knew about

August 11, 2022
Russian-peacekeeping-forces

Both Baku and Yerevan angered by Russian forces’ failures in Karabakh

August 10, 2022

Armenian humanitarian fraud in Lachin

August 8, 2022

‘Small Hiroshima’: Addressing systemic cultural heritage erasure in formerly Armenia-occupied territories

August 4, 2022

In addition to Azerbaijani views of the conflict, we also asked Marat Grigoryan an ethnically Armenian-Azerbaijani who sympathizes with the Armenian side of the conflict what his views are, to understand them and put them into context. Hearing the opinions of both sides is part of Republic Underground’s standards of fair coverage. Views expressed in this interview are solely attributed to the guest. 

A further survival testimony of the ethnic removal of Azerbaijanis from the Karabakh territory again shows that the conflict in Karabakh has been portrayed in a false light by the western media in a rhetoric that is counterproductive to the peace process, which has been continuously damaged by the heated rhetroic surrounding it from both sides of the domestic interest, as well as foreign interest in the outcome. 

Rubin continued his argument in the light that Aliyev, as a proud state leader, continues to work to deceive the American government from the supposition of naivety. Rubin wrote through the lens that the U.S. shows no concern for Azerbaijan’s alleged violation of international agreements, but gave no context to the specific agreements that they were accused of violating. As is common in the polarized rhetoric of the Karabakh conflict, the National Interest article makes generalizations regarding the events of the Karabakh conflict, and points out events that were circulated in the media that were not proven on the official record, or was proven to have been attributed to the opposing combatant. 

For example, Rubin alludes to Azerbaijan’s recruitment of Syrian mercenaries during the conflict. The expert analysis reviewed these allegations, made in the western media, and concluded that, with a superior fighting force, it would have been an act of frivolity for Azerbaijan to recruit Syrian mercenaries. However, troops wearing fatigues of the Syrian variety were photographed on the Armenian fighting line, and when taking into context that Armenia has a historic relationship with Syria, analysts of the Karabakh conflict concluded that it was more likely Armenian lobby-backed guerilla forces recruited Syrian mercenaries and then pinned their presence on the fighting line on the Azerbaijani government as part of a protracted information warfare campaign that has continued to fuel the Karabakh conflict for nearly 30 years. 

The article only alludes to the use of chemical weapons during the Karabakh conflict. Armenia and Azerbaijan have been engaged in heated public rhetoric regarding the use of banned weapons during the war, in which further examination found that Armenia had fired banned weapons such as Smerch missiles on civilian areas including Ganja and Barda, which were outside the firing line. 

#Armenia has accused #Azerbaijan of recruiting #Syrian #Jihadists, but in reality has apparently projected its own foreign recruitment practices to distract from its shaky military position and internal weaknesses & shortcomings.https://t.co/QSApxvDNmv

— Irina Tsukerman (@irinatsukerman) November 5, 2020

In conclusion, the comparison of similarities between Aliyev and Hussein’s characters is a matter of the author’s opinion, but a comparison of Aliyev’s Karabakh conflict and Hussein’s Iraq conquest does not hold the same basis. 

The era politicized as the Armenian genocide was an era of ethnic cleansing from the Transcaucus region that impacted Armenians, Azerbaijanis, Meskhetian Turks, and Jews. An field report by two U.S. troops that were contemporary with the conflict gives a political and unbiased account of both sides of the conflict and the ethnic cleansing of the time, which is now weaponized and politicized for the war of today. 

Rather, the comparisons are made as a continuous motion of the lobby with a vested interest in the conflict. Rubin also writes that Biden, and the American left, are scheduled to recognize the Armenian genocide a century after it happened. This is a continuation of the Armenian rhetoric and lobby support of the American left which weaponizes the era of conflict between the Ottoman Turks and Tsar Nikolas II the Bloody of Russia during the First World conflict. The full context of the ethnic pogroms in Armenia in the 20th century must be weighed outside of the American politicization of them. For example, while Armenians were forced from their land by military advancements of the Ottoman Turks and were rescued by the Tsars of Russia, Armenian Dashnaks likewise exacted a fierce ethnic pogrom policy against Azerbaijanis, Meskhetian Turks, and regional Jews during that conflict, with regards to Van, Turkey. 

Harmful politicization of the conflict in the form of the museum of the fallen Armenians led to a discussion between both Armenians and Azerbaijanis who have expressed the grave hurt that both sides have mutually felt over the governmental decision to raise such a museum, at this raw time of peace process. Articles further politicizing that museum continue to emerge, with western leftist rhetoric of the Karabakh conflict at an all time high. 

The politicization of this fraught period in Transcaucasian history is not conducive to the fragile peace process which has been disrupted by the media narrative of the Park of Trophies, a park that the Azerbaijani people themselves, for a large demographic, found loathsome and asked for the removal of. 

Republic Underground

 

Share9Tweet6SendShare

Get real time update about this post categories directly on your device, subscribe now.

Unsubscribe

Related Posts

9235EEE6-08AA-495B-9617-673293E25CFA
Karabakh

The European mass graves you never knew about

August 11, 2022
Russian-peacekeeping-forces
Karabakh

Both Baku and Yerevan angered by Russian forces’ failures in Karabakh

August 10, 2022
29865388826_9652cbb89a_b
Karabakh

Armenian humanitarian fraud in Lachin

August 8, 2022
105153
Karabakh

‘Small Hiroshima’: Addressing systemic cultural heritage erasure in formerly Armenia-occupied territories

August 4, 2022
TASS_46839842
Karabakh

What are the reasons behind the new escalation in Karabakh?

August 3, 2022
1651731392-1651730966-2021-08-16t211457z_1862476728_rc2k6p96s9ip_rtrmadp_3_afghanistan-conflict-usa
Karabakh

American-style apology: State Department acknowledges death of OSCE Minsk Group

July 27, 2022
Security-Council-of-Armenia-Secretary-Armen-Grigoryan
Karabakh

Armenia pledges to withdraw Armed Forces from Karabakh

July 23, 2022
Armenia_Azerbaijan_50477
Karabakh

Armenia’s refusal to withdraw forces from Karabakh jeopardizes peace efforts

July 21, 2022

New articles

Opinion

‘Decisive steps by Armenia critical for cooperation in South Caucasus’

August 14, 2022
Opinion

Iran continues to scheme against Azerbaijan

August 14, 2022
Energy

The burgeoning energy partnership between Azerbaijan and the EU

August 13, 2022
Opinion

Pro-Kremlin analyst: Little by little all lands in Karabakh will come under Azerbaijan’s control

August 13, 2022
Opinion

Yerevan’s “spy” campaign against Armenians seeking Azerbaijani citizenship

August 13, 2022
News

Ilham Aliyev on Operation Vengeance in Karabakh

August 12, 2022
Energy

Kazakhstan seeks to bypass Russia by selling oil through Azerbaijan

August 12, 2022
Interview

Farid Shafiyev: Burning houses in Lachin will entail military and legal accountability for Armenians

August 12, 2022
Opinion

Details of talks between Turkey and Armenia: Yerevan confirmed having no land claims against Turkey

August 12, 2022
Opinion

Russia-Kazakhstan dynamic in the context of European energy and economic security

August 12, 2022
c24a7d34-02d2-45a2-95ad-980aa8264ad5
426082d1-a9e4-4ac5-95d4-4e84024eb314
ab65ed96-2f4a-4220-91ac-f70a6daaf659
96e40a2b-5fed-4332-83c6-60e4a89fd4d0
759bde00-a375-4fa1-bedc-f8e9580ceeca
aze-media-logo-ag

Aze.Media offers an independent and strategic insight on socio-cultural, political and economic life in Azerbaijan. We are thinkers of diverse disciplines spread across countries working together as one team to provide international audiences with an alternative point of view on Azerbaijani and foreign realities.

Email: editor@aze.media


© 2021 Aze Media International Platform for Alternative Thought.

No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Economy
  • Ecology
  • Energy
  • Opinion
  • Culture
  • Gender
  • Interview
  • Science
  • Logistics-Transport
  • History
  • Defense
  • Karabakh
  • Diaspora
  • Who we are

© 2021 Aze Media International Platform for Alternative Thought.